Monthly Archives :

January 2025

Pros and Cons of Lease to Purchase Agreements in Arizona - Gottlieb Law - Real Estate Attorneys

The Pros and Cons of Lease-to-Purchase Agreements: An Arizona Lawyer’s Perspective

The Pros and Cons of Lease-to-Purchase Agreements: An Arizona Lawyer’s Perspective 1494 1121 Gottlieb Law

Gottlieb Law, PLC provides this article for information purposes only and nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship. You should not take any actions in reliance on any of the information contained herein without consulting with qualified legal counsel first and reading this article is not a proper substitute for seeking legal advice of your specific situation.  Laws change over time and you should seek counsel to discuss any specific legal questions.



A lease-to-purchase agreement, often called a rent-to-own contract, blends the elements of renting a property with the opportunity to purchase it in the future for a pre-determined price. It allows the tenant to live in the home as a renter while reserving the right to purchase it at a pre-agreed price within a specified time frame.

In Arizona, lease-to-purchase agreements are becoming more popular due to competitive housing markets and challenges with traditional home financing. They’re often seen as a win-win, but are they right for you? Whether you’re a buyer considering this option or a seller deciding if it’s worth offering, let’s break down the pros and cons.

The Buyer’s Perspective: Pros and Cons of Lease-to-Purchase Agreements

For buyers determined to achieve homeownership but hindered by traditional financing hurdles, lease-to-purchase agreements can offer a promising alternative. These agreements let you move in, secure an option to purchase later, and work toward ownership on your timeline. Like any significant decision, they carry both advantages and potential drawbacks. Let’s break down the pros and cons in detail to help you decide if this path makes sense for your goals.

Pros for Buyers

  1. Easier Path to Homeownership
    Traditional homebuying often requires a strong credit score and a significant down payment. For buyers unable to meet these standards, lease-to-purchase agreements provide a more accessible route to ownership. These agreements allow you to settle into your future home right away while applying a portion of your rent toward the purchase price. This arrangement helps you steadily progress toward your goal of owning a home without needing to qualify for a mortgage upfront.

  2. Time to Improve Credit or Finances
    Not all buyers are financially ready to secure a mortgage, but a lease-to-purchase agreement offers breathing room. The lease period provides an opportunity to boost your credit score, pay down debt, or build up savings for a larger down payment. When the purchase window opens, you’re likely in a much stronger position to obtain financing at favorable terms.

  3. Locking in a Purchase Price
    Arizona’s real estate market is competitive, and home values can rise quickly. Lease-to-purchase agreements often fix the purchase price at the beginning of the contract, allowing you to avoid the stress of fluctuating property values. If the market climbs, you benefit by buying the home at a price agreed upon before the increase.

  4. Test-Driving the Property
    Buying a home is one of the biggest investments you’ll make, and lease-to-purchase agreements give you a trial run. Living in the home as a tenant allows you to evaluate its layout, condition, and the surrounding neighborhood before making a long-term commitment. This “test drive” can provide peace of mind that you’re making the right choice.

Cons for Buyers

  1. Higher Financial Risk
    While these agreements can open doors, they also come with upfront costs, like a non-refundable option fee. This fee secures your right to purchase the home but isn’t returned if you choose not to buy or can’t secure financing. Additionally, rent in these agreements often includes a premium, meaning you’re paying more monthly compared to a typical lease.

  2. Unclear or Unfavorable Terms
    Not all lease-to-purchase agreements are created equal. Some may place an unfair burden on the buyer, such as requiring you to handle all maintenance and repairs, even though you don’t yet own the home. Without a thorough review by a qualified real estate lawyer, you might unknowingly agree to terms that favor the seller.

  3. Market Changes
    Securing a purchase price upfront can be beneficial if property values rise, but it’s not without its risks. Should the housing market decline during the lease period, you may find yourself committed to paying more for the home than its current market value. This scenario can lead to tough decisions about whether to proceed with the purchase or let the deal go, potentially losing any financial investment already made.

Wrapping Up: Is a Lease-to-Purchase Agreement Right for You?

Lease-to-purchase agreements can be a powerful stepping stone for buyers, especially those who need time to build financial stability or secure financing. The flexibility to live in your future home while working toward ownership is appealing, but the potential risks should not be overlooked.

The key is understanding every detail of the agreement before committing. Working with a knowledgeable real estate lawyer helps ensure that the contract is tailored to your financial objectives and safeguards your rights throughout the process. With proper legal guidance, lease-to-purchase agreements can help you turn homeownership from a dream into reality—on your terms.

The Seller’s Perspective: Pros and Cons of Lease-to-Purchase Agreements

Lease-to-purchase agreements offer Arizona sellers a flexible strategy to navigate the state’s competitive real estate market. This option can appeal to buyers who are unable to secure traditional financing, while providing sellers with the benefit of steady rental income. However, these agreements also bring unique challenges. To decide if this option aligns with your financial and property goals, let’s examine the key advantages and potential risks.

Pros for Sellers

  1. Access to a Larger Pool of Buyers
    Lease-to-purchase agreements appeal to a broader audience, especially those who can’t qualify for a conventional mortgage. This can be particularly beneficial if your property has been sitting on the market for a while or if you want to generate more interest. Offering this flexibility allows you to engage serious potential buyers who may otherwise be excluded from the market.

  2. Steady Rental Income
    A key advantage of a lease-to-purchase arrangement is the dependable rental income it generates throughout the lease period. This income provides reliable financial support, maintaining a consistent cash flow as you move toward completing the sale. This is especially helpful for sellers who still have a mortgage on the property or need time to plan for their next move.

  3. Potential Higher Selling Price
    Sellers often charge a premium for the home in lease-to-purchase agreements, reflecting the added flexibility offered to the buyer. This can lead to a higher overall sale price compared to selling the home outright. Buyers are typically willing to pay this premium for the opportunity to work toward homeownership while living in the property.

  4. Motivated Tenants
    Unlike traditional renters, buyers in lease-to-purchase agreements have a vested interest in the property. They’re more likely to treat the home as their own, maintaining it and even making minor improvements. This helps minimize the challenges of dealing with tenant issues while keeping the property well-maintained.

Cons for Sellers

  1. Uncertainty in the Sale
    A significant risk for sellers is the chance that the buyer is unable to purchase the home. If the buyer cannot secure financing or opts out of the purchase, the seller may find themselves starting the process all over again. This uncertainty can be particularly challenging if the proceeds from the sale are needed to move forward with other plans.

  2. Legal and Financial Complexity
    Lease-to-purchase agreements require carefully crafted contracts to ensure fairness and enforceability. Inadequately written agreements can result in conflicts regarding obligations, payment terms, or default conditions. Without the expertise of a skilled real estate lawyer, you could face avoidable risks and complications.

  3. Delayed Full Payment
    Unlike a traditional sale where you receive the full purchase price upfront, lease-to-purchase agreements require you to wait until the lease period ends. If you need immediate funds—for instance, to purchase another property—this delay could be inconvenient or financially limiting.

  4. Market Changes
    While buyers benefit from locking in a purchase price, sellers face the opposite risk. If property values rise significantly during the lease period, you might end up selling the home for less than its market value. This can lead to missed financial opportunities, particularly in a rapidly appreciating market like Arizona’s.

Wrapping Up: Is a Lease-to-Purchase Agreement Right for You as a Seller?

For sellers, lease-to-purchase agreements can open doors to a wider pool of buyers and provide a steady income stream. At the same time, these agreements carry inherent risks, such as payment delays or the possibility of the deal falling through.

Carefully structuring the agreement is crucial to fully capitalize on its benefits while reducing potential risks. Consulting with a real estate lawyer ensures your contract is legally sound, protects your interests, and aligns with your long-term goals. With proper planning and guidance, a lease-to-purchase agreement could be a valuable strategy to secure a successful sale.

Ready to explore your options? Contact Gottlieb Law for experienced legal advice on crafting lease-to-purchase agreements that work for you.

Important Legal Factors to Consider for Lease-to-Purchase Agreements in Arizona

Lease-to-purchase agreements can offer unique benefits to buyers and sellers alike, but they also carry significant legal complexities. Unlike standard real estate contracts or leases, these hybrid agreements blur the lines between renting and buying, which makes the fine print even more critical. Both parties must approach these contracts with a thorough understanding of their responsibilities and risks to avoid costly disputes or surprises down the road. Let’s unpack the key legal considerations that make or break these agreements in Arizona.

1. Precision in Contracts: Setting the Foundation

The contract is the heart of any lease-to-purchase agreement, and its clarity can determine whether the arrangement succeeds or leads to legal trouble. Every aspect is important, from outlining the purchase price and monthly rent to clarifying what portion of the rent will be applied toward the eventual purchase.

Why It’s Critical: Ambiguity opens the door to disputes. For example, if the agreement doesn’t clearly state who is responsible for property repairs, disagreements can arise over costly maintenance. A carefully crafted contract removes uncertainty and ensures both parties have a clear understanding from the beginning.

Key Elements to Include:

  • Maintenance Responsibilities: Will the buyer-tenant or seller-landlord handle repairs and upkeep?
  • Tax and HOA Obligations: Who pays property taxes or HOA fees during the lease period?
  • Default Terms: What happens if one party doesn’t fulfill their obligations?
    Addressing these details upfront lays the groundwork for a more seamless and successful sale process.

2. The Role of Option Fees: Protecting Investments

Option fees play a key role in lease-to-purchase agreements but are frequently misunderstood. This non-refundable fee guarantees the buyer the exclusive option to purchase the property within an agreed-upon timeframe.

Why It’s Critical: Miscommunication about option fees can lead to frustration and legal battles. Buyers need to understand that forfeiting this fee is a risk if they choose not to buy. Sellers, on the other hand, must handle option fees transparently to avoid accusations of bad faith or misrepresentation.

Questions to Address in the Agreement:

  • Application to Purchase Price: Will the option fee be deducted from the purchase price?
  • Refund Conditions: Under what circumstances, if any, is the fee refundable?
  • Timing: When and how should the option fee be paid?

A clearly articulated approach to option fees can protect the seller’s financial interests while giving the buyer peace of mind.

3. Termination Clauses: Planning for the Unexpected

Life is unpredictable, and lease-to-purchase agreements should account for the possibility that the deal might not go as planned. Clear termination clauses are essential for both buyers and sellers, outlining when and how the agreement can be ended and detailing the next steps in such cases.

Why It’s Critical: Without well-defined termination terms, disagreements over broken agreements can escalate into lengthy legal battles. Whether the buyer can’t secure financing or the seller decides to sell to someone else, a termination clause ensures the consequences are fair and enforceable.

Key Considerations:

  • Buyers Failing to Purchase: If the buyer can’t buy the home by the end of the lease, will they lose their rent credits or option fee?
  • Seller Backing Out: What penalties should the seller face if they withdraw from the agreement? What are acceptable reasons for them to not move forward with the purchase?
  • Default Scenarios: Clearly outline the specific actions or failures that would qualify as a breach of contract, such as missed payments, failure to maintain the property, or not meeting deadlines. Additionally, establish a detailed process for resolving disputes, including whether mediation, arbitration, or legal action will be pursued, to ensure both parties have a clear path forward in case of disagreements.

Termination clauses safeguard both parties against unexpected situations and offer a clear framework for resolving conflicts efficiently and without unnecessary legal expenses.

4. Legal Compliance in Arizona: Navigating Local Nuances

Arizona has specific laws and regulations that apply to lease-to-purchase agreements, making it essential to understand these specific legal nuances. For example, Arizona’s landlord-tenant laws may intersect with the lease portion of the agreement, while real estate laws affect the purchase aspect.

Why It’s Critical: Failing to comply with Arizona’s legal requirements can render your agreement unenforceable or expose you to legal liability. Sellers must ensure their contracts align with state property laws, and buyers need to confirm that the agreement doesn’t violate their rights as tenants.

Key Areas of Compliance:

  • Disclosure Requirements: Sellers must disclose known defects in the property to avoid future claims of misrepresentation.
  • Payment Structures: Ensure the financial arrangements comply with Arizona contract law and are properly documented.
  • Fair Housing Laws: Agreements must comply with regulations that prohibit discrimination based on protected characteristics such as race, religion, gender, disability, or family status.

Ignoring local regulations can turn a promising deal into a legal nightmare.

5. The Importance of Professional Legal Review

Lease-to-purchase agreements are not one-size-fits-all, and using a template without customization can leave you exposed to significant risks. Both buyers and sellers should seek the guidance of a qualified real estate attorney to carefully review or draft the agreement.

Why It’s Critical: An experienced lawyer can identify red flags, ensure compliance with Arizona laws, and negotiate terms that protect your interests. Attorneys can also help mediate disputes, saving both time and money if any conflicts emerge.

When to Seek Legal Help:

  • Before signing the agreement, to ensure you understand every clause.
  • If disputes arise during the lease period.
  • To renegotiate terms or address changes in circumstances.

A professional legal review is the best investment you can make to safeguard your financial and legal interests in a lease-to-purchase agreement.

Final Thought: Building Agreements That Work

Lease-to-purchase agreements hold immense potential for both buyers and sellers, but the legal landscape surrounding them is complex. Emphasizing clarity, fairness, and compliance helps craft an agreement that protects both parties and reduces potential risks. Whether you’re exploring homeownership or looking to sell, navigating these agreements without expert guidance is risky.

Should You Consider a Lease-to-Purchase Agreement?

Lease-to-purchase agreements are a unique opportunity for buyers and sellers to achieve their goals in a way that traditional real estate transactions may not allow. For buyers, they provide time to improve finances and secure a future home while testing whether the property truly fits their needs. Sellers have the opportunity to reach a larger pool of prospective buyers and benefit from a steady stream of rental income while working toward finalizing the sale. But these arrangements require careful consideration—poorly drafted contracts can lead to disputes, financial losses, or missed opportunities. The key is ensuring every aspect of the agreement is transparent, balanced, and legally sound to make the process as seamless as possible for both parties.

When it comes to significant real estate transactions like lease-to-purchase agreements, partnering with an experienced real estate law firm is crucial. A skilled lawyer can anticipate potential challenges, craft precise contracts, and ensure compliance with Arizona’s legal standards—giving you peace of mind throughout the process. At Gottlieb Law, we help buyers and sellers navigate the complexities of lease-to-purchase agreements, ensuring every detail aligns with your needs and safeguards your interests. With the right contract in place, lease-to-purchase agreements can unlock a path to successful transactions and mutually beneficial outcomes. 

Call our firm today at 602-899-8188 to schedule your initial consultation or use our Contact Us page.



Gottlieb Law, PLC provides this article for information purposes only and nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship. You should not take any actions in reliance on any of the information contained herein without consulting with qualified legal counsel first and reading this article is not a proper substitute for seeking legal advice of your specific situation.  Laws change over time and you should seek counsel to discuss any specific legal questions.

 

A guide answering common questions on Arizona's naked title, explaining legal implications, ownership rights, and what Arizona property owners need to know.

Everything You Need to Know About Arizona Naked Title – FAQs

Everything You Need to Know About Arizona Naked Title – FAQs 1936 1296 Gottlieb Law
Gottlieb Law, PLC provides this article for information purposes only and nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship. You should not take any actions in reliance on any of the information contained herein without consulting with qualified legal counsel first and reading this article is not a proper substitute for seeking legal advice of your specific situation.  Laws change over time and you should seek counsel to discuss any specific legal questions.

When it comes to property law in Arizona, the state has an assortment of unique and specific laws.  One topic that often raises questions is the concept of naked title. Naked title, a term you may have come across in trust and estate planning, refers to holding legal title to a property without the equitable interest.  It’s important for property owners, trustees, and investors alike, to understand it. Being familiar with naked title in Arizona can make a significant difference when it comes to navigating property ownership rights, legal responsibilities, and inheritance.

While the term “naked title” isn’t frequently used by Arizona courts today, it remains an important concept for understanding the distinction between legal title and equitable ownership in property law. In Arizona, this principle is particularly relevant in trust administration and estate planning, where trustees often hold naked title while beneficiaries retain the equitable rights to the property. This blog will explore the nuances of naked title, its applications in Arizona property law, and what it means for trustees, beneficiaries, and property owners. 

What is Naked Title?

In property law, naked title refers to holding the legal title of a property without any of the benefits of ownership, such as the right to occupy, use, or benefit financially from the property. It’s a title in name only, separating legal ownership from beneficial ownership, which belongs to another party.

In Arizona, the concept of naked title often comes into play in situations involving trusts and estates. In these scenarios, a trustee may hold the legal title to property (the naked title) on behalf of a beneficiary, who holds the equitable title. Equitable title entitles the beneficiary to the benefits and income associated with the property, while the trustee’s role as the naked title holder is typically administrative.

Why is Naked Title Important in Arizona Property Law?

Understanding naked title is important for anyone involved in Arizona real estate or estate planning. Whether you’re a trustee, a beneficiary, or an investor, naked title can impact your rights, responsibilities, and financial interests.

For trustees in particular, naked title defines their role: they hold the legal title without personal rights to use the property or profit from it.  While naked title itself does not inherently “protect” assets, it establishes clear ownership structures within a trust or estate, making it easier to manage and distribute property in alignment with the trust’s or estate’s goals. 

How is Naked Title Different from Full Ownership?

To clarify the difference, let’s look at what full ownership entails versus holding naked title:

  • Full Ownership: The owner has both legal and equitable rights to the property, which means they can use, occupy, and transfer the property as they wish. They’re also entitled to any income generated by the property.
  • Naked Title: The titleholder has legal ownership but lacks the rights to benefit from the property. For example, a trustee with naked title can’t occupy, rent out, or transfer the property for personal benefit.

In Arizona, this distinction is crucial, particularly in estate and trust management. Beneficiaries with equitable title have the right to income and benefits, while trustees hold naked title as custodians.

When Does Someone Typically Hold Naked Title?

Naked title is most commonly seen in Arizona trust arrangements, where a trustee is appointed to hold title to property on behalf of beneficiaries. Here are some common legal scenarios:

  • Trusts: The trustee holds naked title while beneficiaries receive the property’s benefits. This arrangement protects the beneficiary’s interests while allowing the trustee to manage the property.
  • Estates: During the administration of an estate, an executor or personal representative might hold legal title temporarily while facilitating the distribution of property to heirs. However, this role is often transitional and not identical to holding naked title in a trust context.
  • Custodianships: A custodian, often in cases involving minors, holds legal title to manage assets for someone who cannot manage them independently. This ensures the property is managed in the best interests of the beneficiary until they are legally capable of assuming control.

Using the property for personal benefit could breach fiduciary responsibilities in the above situations.

How Does Naked Title Impact Property Tax and Liability?

The responsibilities of a naked titleholder differ from those of a full property owner, and this distinction is clear in Arizona’s tax and liability rules. Here’s what naked titleholders need to know:

  • Property Taxes: Generally, the party benefiting from the property (usually the equitable titleholder) is responsible for property taxes. In Arizona, this means that trustees with only legal title are typically not liable for property taxes unless they’re specifically directed to manage such payments on behalf of the trust.
  • Liabilities: Naked titleholders in Arizona don’t bear liabilities related to the property, as they aren’t entitled to its benefits. The equitable titleholder, who has usage and financial rights, would bear these responsibilities unless otherwise specified.

For example, in the case of a rental property within a trust, the beneficiary would be responsible for tax and liability, not the trustee holding legal title. This setup is designed to protect trustees from financial burden, keeping their role limited to administrative functions.

Can Naked Title be Transferred or Sold?

While naked title itself can be transferred, the specific legal arrangements of a trust or estate often dictate if and when this transfer can occur. Here’s how transfer and sale of naked title works:

If you’re dealing with a potential transfer or sale of property where naked title is involved, a qualified attorney can help navigate the requirements and approvals necessary for a legal transaction.

How Gottlieb Law Can Help with Naked Title Issues

Navigating the nuances of naked title requires experience. At Gottlieb Law, we’ve helped Arizona property owners, investors, trustees, and beneficiaries resolve issues related to property ownership, trust administration, and estate planning. Our team can clarify your rights, responsibilities, and options as a naked titleholder and provide guidance on any legal actions you may be considering.

Whether you’re a trustee managing a property, a beneficiary looking to understand your rights, or simply someone looking to set up a trust, Gottlieb Law is here to provide clear, customized support.

Common Questions About Naked Title

Naked title is a complex area of property law that leaves many property owners, trustees, and beneficiaries with questions about their rights, responsibilities, and limitations. This section covers some frequently asked questions, from legal steps to potential financial impacts, helping clarify the most important aspects for those holding or involved with holding legal (but not equitable) title in Arizona. Here’s a closer look at what you need to know.

What legal steps should I take if I hold naked title?

If you hold naked title, your role typically involves a fiduciary duty to manage the property on behalf of a beneficiary or trust. Since you’re responsible for safeguarding the interests of others, it’s essential to understand the specific legal obligations that come with your position. Here’s what to keep in mind:

  • Know Your Role in the Trust: Review the terms of the trust or estate documentation that specifies your duties as a titleholder. This can include actions you’re authorized to take, such as maintenance or tax-related responsibilities, and limitations on actions like sale or transfer.
  • Seek Legal Counsel: Working with a real estate or trust attorney ensures that you’re acting within legal bounds. An attorney can help clarify responsibilities unique to Arizona property law, including specific requirements related to trustee obligations and fiduciary responsibilities.
  • Maintain Transparent Records: Keeping thorough records of any transactions, communications, or property-related decisions you make as a naked titleholder is crucial. Documentation can help protect you in cases of disputes, proving that your actions align with the trust’s intent and beneficiaries’ interests.

Can I transition from naked title to full ownership?

The transition from holding naked title to full ownership isn’t straightforward and is often restricted by the terms of the trust or estate. Here’s how to determine if, and how, such a transition might be possible:

  • Understand the Trust’s Stipulations: In most cases, the trust outlines who holds equitable ownership and under what circumstances, if any, a transfer to full ownership may occur. Generally, a trustee cannot claim full ownership of a property held in trust without specific authorization from the trust document.
  • Consider Beneficiary Approval: For naked titleholders acting as trustees, a transfer of ownership may require the consent of the beneficiaries. Even in cases where the trustee has some discretionary power, transferring or assuming full ownership without beneficiary approval could be legally challenged and may lead to disputes and liability.
  • Explore Succession Planning: Some trusts have built-in provisions that automatically pass full ownership to beneficiaries under certain conditions. Consulting with a legal professional can clarify whether you can assume full ownership directly or if a succession plan already designates future owners.

Are there any financial advantages or drawbacks to holding naked title?

Holding naked title doesn’t generally come with financial perks, as it’s strictly a legal designation without any direct economic benefits. However, here are some important financial factors to keep in mind:

  • No Right to Profits: As a naked titleholder, you don’t have the right to income or financial gains from the property, such as rent or sale proceeds. Those financial rights belong to the equitable owner, who benefits from the property’s earnings or growth in value.
  • Tax Implications: Naked titleholders are generally not responsible for property taxes or other taxes associated with ownership, as these obligations fall to the equitable owner or beneficiaries. However, it’s essential to understand the specific tax roles outlined in the trust or estate documents to avoid misinterpretations that could result in unexpected liabilities.
  • Reduced Financial Risk: One benefit of holding only naked title is a lower level of financial liability. Naked titleholders don’t bear the same financial risks as full owners, such as market fluctuations or repair costs, as these fall under the equitable owner’s responsibilities.
  • Trustee Compensation: Trustees who hold naked title as part of their fiduciary role are typically entitled to reasonable compensation for their services, as outlined in the trust document or under Arizona law. This compensation is separate from any financial benefits associated with the property itself and is intended to reflect the time, effort, and responsibilities involved in trust management.

Summing Up: Naked Title Roles and Responsibilities

Naked title comes with a distinct set of responsibilities and limitations, making it essential to fully understand your legal standing. Whether you are managing property within a trust, assisting with estate administration, or navigating Arizona’s specific property laws, knowing what naked title permits and restricts is critical.

For trustees, this means adhering to fiduciary duties while safeguarding the interests of beneficiaries. To ensure compliance with legal obligations and avoid potential disputes, working with legal professionals can help you align your actions with the law, the terms of the trust, and the best interests of all parties involved.

Understanding Your Property Rights in Arizona

Understanding naked title is essential for Arizona property owners, trustees, and beneficiaries. This unique form of title requires awareness of its limitations, liabilities, and legal boundaries, and knowing your role can make managing or inheriting property far easier.

Reach out to Gottlieb Law today if you have questions about naked title or want to secure your property rights and ensure your ownership interests are safeguarded under Arizona law. Our experienced attorneys are ready to guide you through every step of the process. Call us at 602-899-8188 or use our Contact Us page to schedule an initial consultation with our firm.


Gottlieb Law, PLC provides this article for information purposes only and nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship. You should not take any actions in reliance on any of the information contained herein without consulting with qualified legal counsel first and reading this article is not a proper substitute for seeking legal advice of your specific situation.  Laws change over time and you should seek counsel to discuss any specific legal questions.